Dear DC diary,
With regards to Spider-Man 3 and The Dark Knight Rises, I’ll add to what @TheWifeOfJasonTodd said:
Nobody ever said humans on the Internet were smart.
Case in point: I read a comment out in the greater Interwebs a week ago about the Morbius movie, which reads as follows and I quote:
“Morbius is one of the dumbest movies I’ve ever seen in my life.”
After reading that nugget, I thought the following:
“So, you’ve what, seen 5 movies in your life, including Morbius, so far?”
If a major Hollywood movie from a major Hollywood studio is the dumbest movie you’ve ever seen, then you really need to look into the Z-grade garbage of moviedom.
Movies like (and these are all absolutely, 100% real, my hand to Rao):
- Monster a Go-Go
- The Giant Spider Invasion
- Invasion of the Neptune Men
- The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies
- Any movie directed by Ed Wood
Those are movies that are truly stifling in their brobdingnagian ineptitude, both in how they were made and in their “entertainment value”, of which there is next to none (the unintentional comedy value of all of those movies is through the roof, however).
…and I didn’t even dive into the garbage found in the made for TV and direct to video arenas. If you want to see a hideously stupid movie, then made for TV and direct to video are your ticket.
SN: There are plenty of good made for TV and direct to video movies, BTW.
Its just that when those types of movies are clunkers, they really clunk along, in most respects.
Anyway…
Morbius may indeed be a stinker, because Hollywood churns out a ton of bad movies.
Bad as it may be though, I really doubt its the dumbest said commentator has seen. If so however, they need to see the movies I cited above.
Then, they’ll know true celluloid-based stupidity.
The point of the above ramble is that while I find both SM3 and TDKR to be the least of their respective trilogies, they’re still solidly-made (technically-speaking) when compared to the real cinematic crap that exists in all levels of moviedom.
Between the two, I side with TDKR.
No, not because its a DC movie. I prefer it because:
-
Its hero didn’t do a stupid sidewalk dance.
-
Said hero didn’t flip his hair in an “Ooh, I’m bad, now.” way that made the theater laugh.
-
Its main villain doesn’t retroactively change the first movie of its respective trilogy.
-
It didn’t have Kirsten Dunst playing MJ to an annoying degree.
-
It didn’t have Harry Osborn say “bop-bop” while eating pie.
-
It didn’t have a villain the director didn’t like, but was forced to include, due to studio pressure.
-
It did have the lovely Anne Hathaway as Catwoman.
I liked Spider-Man 3 well-enough when it came out (used to have all of its action figures, afterall), but in the 15 years since, I see it as the dud of Raimi’s Marvel output.
SM3 did have Bryce Dallas Howard as Gwen Stacy and a great Bruce Campbell cameo, so the movie does have some positives (another being Spider-Man’s initial fight with Sandman).
Anyway…this ramble was brought to you by Miranda Tate.
Miranda Tate, she’s in a league of her own.