Hi @CynicalPink
You’ve brought up a really interesting element about Vandal and his psychology. Well done.
I’ll throw my $0.02 cents in the ring and others with different please chime in, if so inclined. (There are no wrong answers here.)
I think one additional reason for Vandal making use of religion as a way to create community and possibly setup his own cult around himself.
In some pantheistic religions there is a hierarchy to the gods. The Greek pantheon has many gods, but Zeus is “top of the food chain”. So he may see himself as a god but under a few gods more powerful than he is. (He is immortal but can’t shoot lightning like Zeus, for example) Another potential aspect is paying homage to the gods of things that he can’t control, like the weather, bountiful crop harvests, etc.
Another possibility is he is sacrificing to gods that are his brothers and sisters. Setting himself up as one of the gods in the pantheon that is tangible on earth. This could also help create a cult around himself. Even as time went on, and monotheistic religions developed and gained power, having a secret cult following could be useful. Especially because it gives him another way, through his followers, to get close to power and pull some of the strings, via an intermediary.
So by creating and controlling a “cult”, he would develop a community of followers that are useful agents for implementing his plans. And this could be done in either of the two models above. People might follow him because the cult through a blood sacrifice by Savage, could take a sip of the blood sacrifice and not gain immortality but, in theory, reality, or propaganda, could extend their lives by some measure. This was part of the cult that surrounded him that CW’s Legends of Tomorrow touched on, for example.
Also, there are “blanks” in many of his histories, and some of the items you bring up are left for the reader to fill in. Which is one of the reasons he is so psychologically interesting to me. There are gaps and one can hypothesis about what is the reason for those gaps.
I will also concur that the art in the DC Universe 3-parter really made great use of his expressions and especially his eyes to give insight into the character. Again, those close-ups are ways of letting the reader fill in some blanks about what he is thinking/feeling behind the words. Of all of them, I think the DC Universe Presents may be the most interesting comics and open up Vandal for analysis, because of the ambiguity you mention.
Well, that’s my $0.02. Hopefully this has helped and will spark further debate, “hot takes”, etc.
Bringing up questions is always great. Just cuz I post a few, doesn’t mean we have to stick to them or only to them. That’s one of the things this club I hope will do. Bringing up questions and opinions about the psychology of the villain because people have different perspectives and that gives people something to consider they may not have before.