I liked it a lot, because as many times as Lex courts death in dealing with Superman (not that Superman would kill him; rather, its the people, tech and situations Lex consorts with, uses and finds himself in, more often than not) its only apropos that he actually met Death and during a storyline where heās trying to indulge his own lust for power, nonetheless.
Did he really need it though? He was pretty motivated already. I think you could have accomplished it without bringing the personification of death itself to come visit him. It felt beneath her.
The impression I got from Cornell on that was more like he presented his dialogue to Gaiman and he approved it, not that he wrote any of it. Approval and authorship are two very different standards.
Besides giving the OK to use Death, what sort of role did Neil play in the genesis of this issue?
He looked over the script, and ended up writing a chunk of Deathās dialogue. I was well pleased with that, it was like singing with a friend. He does the high notes.
I also am a bit, I dunno - the idea that visiting people to help them is ābeneathā Death feels wrong. She loves us all, even the wretchedly evil like Lex Luthor.
Several of the easier to find interviews do seem to indicate that it was a simple approval process, but I remember reading this interview way back when I bought the issue, so I wanted to get it on the record.